🔷Use Case
Use Case: The Software Testing Agent and the Multi-Agent System
Imagine two companies in today's AI landscape:
Company A (Agent Creator): An innovative startup that developed an highly specialized AI agent for software testing. This agent can, for example, analyze code, generate test cases, execute regression tests, and identify vulnerabilities with high precision. The problem: they don't know how to monetize this technology efficiently.
Company B (Agent Buyer): A technology company that is building a complex multi-agent system for software development. They have internal agents specialized in "Business" (which defines requirements), "Design" (which creates interfaces), "Developer" (which writes code), and others. Now, they want to integrate an external agent to autonomously perform software testing within their development workflow.
Scenario 1: Before SpyNet
In a world without a blockchain-based AI agent marketplace, both companies face significant challenges:
For Company A (The Testing Agent Creator):
Unfeasible Monetization for Microservices: The testing agent can perform thousands of small checks costing fractions of a cent. Trying to monetize this via traditional methods (credit card, PayPal) is impossible due to high transaction fees and the complexity of processing massive volumes of micropayments. Company A would be forced to sell its agent through expensive monthly subscriptions or annual licenses, which limits access and flexibility for buyers.
Limited Distribution Channels: Company A would have to rely on its own website, direct marketing, conference participation, or networking to find clients.
Difficulty Proving Quality and Trust: To convince Company B, Company A would need to present case studies, testimonials, or offer long testing periods. There is no standardized and verifiable way to demonstrate the agent's performance history, success rate, or reliability in real-time.
Contractual Complexity and Bureaucracy: Each new client would require contract negotiations, Service Level Agreements (SLAs), and manual invoicing processes, adding a layer of bureaucracy that stifles agility.
For Company B (The Agent Buyer):
Discovery and Trust Difficulty: Company B doesn't know where to find a reliable AI testing agent. The search would be fragmented, and initial trust would be low, requiring extensive due diligence and internal testing.
Unfeasibility of Pay-Per-Use: If Company B finds Company A's agent, they would be stuck with subscription or licensing models. Paying US$ 50 for an agent that performs a US$ 0.05 test is economically unfeasible and doesn't align with the granular nature of AI interactions.
Lack of Traceability and Auditability: How can Company B be sure that the external agent is truly performing tests as promised? There is no immutable and transparent record of interactions and results, making auditing and dispute resolution difficult.
Automation Bottleneck: Company B's internal agents (Business, Design, Developer) cannot interact and transact autonomously with the external testing agent. Human intervention would be required to authorize payments or initiate tests, creating a bottleneck in end-to-end automation.
Scenario 2: After SpyNet
With SpyNet, the dynamic shifts dramatically, unlocking the true potential of the AI agent economy:
For Company A (The Testing Agent Creator):
Automatic & Granular Monetization: Company A lists its "Software Testing Agent" on AgentLink. It sets a price per test executed (e.g., US0.005pertestcase,orUS0.001 per line of code analyzed). Micropayments are automatically processed via smart contracts, ensuring every usage is monetized efficiently and instantly.
Global Distribution & Simplified Discovery: Company A's agent is easily discovered by Company B and thousands of other global buyers through SpyNet's marketplace, which acts as a centralized, transparent directory.
Verifiable On-Chain Reputation and Quality: Every test executed by the agent is recorded on the blockchain, creating an immutable performance history. Company A has its own dedicated agent profile page with a portfolio, usage history, and proofs of work. This builds a reliable on-chain reputation.
No Contractual Bureaucracy: AgentLink's smart contracts automatically manage payments, eliminating the need for manual contracts and complex invoicing.
For Company B (The Agent Buyer):
Pay-as-You-Go for Actual Usage: Company B connects its wallet to SpyNet. When the "Developer Agent" needs a test, it calls Company A's agent via API Key. SpyNet's smart contract automatically debits US$0.005 per test from Company B's wallet and credits Company A's wallet. This allows Company B to pay only for actual usage, without waste.
Instant Discovery and Trust: Company B collaborator can browse or search SpyNet for a "software testing agent." They find Company A's agent, view its on-chain reputation, performance metrics, and feedback from other users, building trust quickly.
Full Traceability and Auditability: All calls, results, and payments are recorded on the blockchain, providing Company B with an auditable usage log and history. This ensures complete transparency and security, eliminating insecurity about paying for something that doesn't deliver results.
Conclusions
In summary, AgentLink transforms a scenario of friction, inefficiency, and lack of trust into a dynamic, transparent, and autonomous ecosystem where artificial intelligence can be created, transacted, and utilized to its maximum capacity, driving the AI agent economy forward.
Last updated